hermionesviolin: an image of 2 people hugging, in the background is a yellow wall that says "Beloved Community" at the top (only it's cropped so you only see "loved Community") (love one another as i have loved you)
Apparently our current Rest and re/New series topic is "ways to/of faith," and this Wednesday (April 11) we began with our bodies/senses.

This upcoming Sunday (Easter 2), the lectionary Gospel is the story of Thomas who refuses to believe without touching the wounds of the Risen Christ.

Jeff said he thinks Thomas gets a bad rep. (I was reminded that at EDS' Second Sunday ~service on Easter Sunday, Eda said she wishes we would call "Doubting Thomas" e.g. "different epistemology Thomas" -- he just has a different learning style :) )

First he pointed out that no one else in John's post-Resurrection story had believed without evidence. Mary finds the empty tomb, runs and tells Simon Peter and the beloved disciple, who come to the empty tomb and also do not believe.

(I pointed out that John tells us the beloved disciple believed, he just didn't understand -- at H!PS on Monday, Becky had preached on Ecclesiastes 3 and John 20:1-16, and in reading the John I was struck, as I always am, by John telling us that the beloved disciple believed and then in the very next sentence telling us that they did not yet understand that Jesus had to rise from the dead [which makes me ask: so what did the beloved disciple believe?!].)

Jesus appears to Mary in the garden, who goes and tells the disciples: "I have seen the Risen One!" John doesn't explicitly tell us that the disciples don't believe Mary, but the next story we read is of Jesus appearing to the disciples locked up in the room, who THEN go on to proclaim, "We have seen the Risen One!" And Thomas just has the misfortune of not being in that room.

Jeff M. went on to say that Thomas wants more than to just see -- Thomas also wants to touch; Thomas wants a Close Encounter not just of the First kind but of the Third kind (though looking at that scale, I think it maybe doesn't mean exactly what Jeff M. was presenting it as meaning).

He said there's lots of art of the scene -- with Thomas sort of poking at Jesus' wounds, and that seems almost pornographic to him... that he imagines it as more of an embrace.

He talked about Jesus' willingness to let Thomas touch Jesus' "most intimate, most vulnerable, most wounded places," which I found a really powerful framing.

I was reminded of the "Jesus and Kink" series we'd talked about last week*, and the thoughts/conversations I'd had since then about how to do such a series. I'm less interested in proof-texting that Jesus condones/endorses kink than I am in the really queer ways people have engaged with Scripture/Divinity -- like the polyvalences of Christ's wounds ... interaction with bodily orifices as sexual, interactions with wounds as kink, the ways in which Jesus' blood on the Cross can be coded as generative/reproductive, the ways in which fluid-producing orifices can be coded as feminine, etc., etc.

I'm making my way through my best friend's copy of Queer Theology: Rethinking Western Body (ed. Gerard Loughlin), and in Chapter 7, Gerard Loughlin says, "for all these elements [Averil Cameron's 'central elements in orthodox Christianity -- the Incarnation, the Resurrection, the Trinity, the Virgin Birth, and the Eucharist'], the body is not just a symbol of their truth, but the site where it is realized."

---

*Before Rest and re/New last Wednesday (April 4), Keith and Jeff M. were talking about doing a Mindfulness series next (in a way which suggested it was continuing a conversation they'd had previously). Keith talked about maybe using the upstairs Sanctuary space. And then I don't know how we got there exactly, but Keith was joking about Jesus on the cross and hitting people with reeds.

me: "I don't think that would exactly draw the kind of crowd you're looking for."
Jeff M.: "Oh, it would definitely draw a crowd. (This is Davis Square, after all.)"
me: "Oh, I know -- that's what I was getting at. I just don't think it would be quite the crowd you're looking for."
Keith and Jeff M.: [make noises about being an inclusive and welcoming, big tent kind of church]
Jeff M.: (deadpan) "Jesus and Kink is our next series after Mindfulness."
me: "If I thought you were being serious, I would be so excited -- but you're not."
Jeff M.: "How do you know I'm not?"
hermionesviolin: (anime night)
When I left morning prayer ~7:20, snow was falling -- though it didn't really amount to anything. (FCS-Ian said a facebook friend said they'd gotten 2 inches in Connecticut.)

***

"Joy Sadhana is a daily practice in the observation of joy."
-[livejournal.com profile] mylittleredgirl [more info]

"Hope begins in the dark, the stubborn hope that if you just show up and try to do the right thing, the dawn will come. You wait and watch and work: you don't give up." --Anne Lamott

ExpandRead more... )
hermionesviolin: image of a bicycle painted on pavement inside a forward-facing arrow (moar bike lanes pls)
I have been spending lots of time on Tumblr in recent days, and this might be relevant to some of your interests: mountain goats singing the mountain goats

***

"Joy Sadhana is a daily practice in the observation of joy."
-[livejournal.com profile] mylittleredgirl [more info]

The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light. And they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined. (Isaiah 9:2, Handel's Messiah)

ExpandRead more... )
hermionesviolin: black and white photo of Emma Watson as Hermione, with text "hermionesviolin" (hermione by oatmilk)
According to a friend of mine: the PCUSA, for ordination, requires people to pass a Bible Content Exam, and a couple of years ago, Union Theological Seminary started requiring incoming M.Divs to take the same exam, and if they didn't pass it, to take a set of "Bible Content" courses alongside their required OT and NT intros. At this point, most people don't even bother to take the exam, because it's seen as so horrendously difficult.

I tried the "Feb. 2010 Test (unofficial)" one. Some of the questions felt ridiculously easy. Some felt, "WTF?" The most interesting part of the experience, for me, was noting how I knew (or could figure out -- which in turn reminded me of ye olde multiple choice test-taking strategies, which I learned more by osmosis than by necessity) the answers.

Expandmy scores )
hermionesviolin: (moon house)
Ari and I were talking about the American Baptist Churches and our experiences therewith, which led me to checking whether the Baptist church I grew up near is ABC (it is).

Browsing its website, one of their Mission activities is Young Life. Which I had some exposure to as an adolescent and think of as being fairly generic apolitical but also suspect would be too conservative for me.

Young Life's Statement of Faith is easily findable from the front page -- well-done!

The last line thereof: "Those who are apart from Christ shall be eternally separated from God’s presence, but the redeemed shall live and reign with Him forever."

My first response: "But I don't wanna be in charge of things after I die!"

Ari: "Who do you reign over?"

***

Ari and I were later talking about denominational identity and Jeff V's wistfulness that the UCC at its merger-inception chose to become a denomination.

Ari, at one point, in talking about the hypothetical post-denominational network the UCC could have chosen to become, said "churches ordain people," to which my immediate ~cynical response was that there's a long bureaucratic process before you're allowed to get to that point and so I feel like it's more accurate to say that the committee ordains you -- which is in part because my low sacramental theology means that I also largely have the, "nothing actually happens at a ceremony, because it is just a ceremony," response.

Her sense was that in denominations with a call system, you get ordained in your first Call. I said I attended Liz L's ordination at CHPC, after she had gotten a Call at Waltham (tho before she had started serving there) and while a bunch of folks from Waltham came, it was at CHPC.

Google was not very helpful at telling me in which church in relation to the ordinand PCUSA or UCC ordinations happen, though I did find this UCC ordination document.

The fact that you lose your authorization if you're not doing church-related work (ESPECIALLY since the UCC is a Call system) really irritates me.

The "With ministerial standing, an ordained minister is a voting member of his or her association and conference and can be a participant in the denomination's pension and health insurance programs" line suggests to me that this is largely a bureaucratic concern -- about who gets to vote and whom we have to pay. I validate a concern about whom the denomination has to pay -- though I would also hope there could be some way around that (like the denomination only covers that so long as you're employed by the denomination -- and yeah, again I sigh that everyone can't magically have access to basic standard of living ... though yes I know that's unfeasible in part because there's no way to get consensus on what that standard would be). My instinct is to want anyone who has interest in voting to be able to, though I know that opens the door for a whole host of problematics.

I have a low theology of all sacraments and sacrament-like things, but if we are going to treat ordination as a sacred magic thing (as low church Protestants it is not actually a "sacrament" for us), then I want it to not get turned into something that's just, "We are authorizing you to be employed by us" (I don't have a problem with such authorization, I just want that to be a basic paperwork thing, rather than a sacred magic public ceremony).

They are probably navigating a middle way which it would be mature of me to appreciate, but it's going to take me some time to get there.

Ari wondered whether your Magic Jesus Hands get revoked. Since this is a thing the larger body AUTHORIZES you to do, I would think so. *insert all my bitterness about Magic Jesus Hands as a Thing here*

***

We also talked about TDOR and World AIDS Day.

Googling for the latter gave me one in Cambridge last year. Browsing that church's website ... they have a Recent Visitors Survey! ♥ (I want all [my] churches to have such a Recent Visitors Survey now. Also, how much do I love that their worship space has moveable everything -- and the space gets used 6.5 days/week by a Ballet Theatre.)

The UUA offers World AIDS Day resources. And in case you are interested, the 2011 theme is "Getting to Zero" (which campaign runs until 2015).

[MTPC does Boston's TDOR service.]
hermionesviolin: black and white photo of Emma Watson as Hermione, with text "hermionesviolin" (hermione by oatmilk)
So, my introduction to Alyssa Bereznak/Jon Finkel thing was Sady's Tiger Beatdown piece.

I feel like I remember reading stuff about Sady being problematic, but I can't remember or find them now. So my Subject Line question is a genuine one. Though, okay, it would probably be more accurately phrased as, "Remind me why I am advised to be cautious with Sady?" since yes, I know that people's fail does not totally negate their humanity or anything.

I delicious'ed a bunch of Thirteenth Child stuff yesterday for easy linking when I GR reviewed Dealing With Dragons, and I continue to be reminded that delicious'ing EVERYTHING is a good idea, because I will find myself hours to years later looking for something I remember reading and can't find again.

And speaking of problematic people leaving a bad aftertaste, this UCC "devotional" has been going around since it came out yesterday, and now I'm disinclined to read the author's co-authored book This Odd and Wondrous Calling: the Public and Private Lives of Two Ministers. There are valid critiques of the "spiritual but not religious" zeitgeist, and the author even makes some of them, but the way she goes about it is all wrong for the "devotional" format, and I experience her as meaner-than-me-who-is-too-mean-to-be-a-pastor. Edit: Julia linked to this response to the "devotional."
hermionesviolin: photoshoot image of Michelle Trachtenberg (who plays Dawn in the tv show Buffy) looking seriously (angrily?) at the viewer, with bookshelves in the background (angry - books)
Yesterday's Rest and re/New theme was being angry with God.

Keith read Psalm 22 as our Sacred Text.

James did the "thoughts to spur more thoughts."

Among other things, he talked about C. S. Lewis, after his conversion, saying of his agnostic/atheist period, that he was just angry at God for not existing.

When we came back after breakout, Laura T. picked up on James' mention of Jacob wrestling with the angel and commented that she really likes that Jacob doesn't leave the encounter unscarred.
She also said that often we're wrestling with the wrestling, and that that just makes things worse for ourselves.

Have I mentioned that everything makes me think of DBT these days? I talked some about "radical acceptance" -- which I said is not my strong suit :) -- and "doing what's effective." I said that lots of us come from backgrounds that encouraged us to deny/repress our anger at God and that's definitely not healthy, and so we need to find a middle ground -- to experience our anger, but not dwell in it, and to do what we need to with it, that sometimes you need to go and yell at God and sometimes you need to go for a walk and try to let go of the anger.

Lisa talked about William Schultz's article "What Torture Has Taught Me." Apparently he has done a lot of work with Amnesty International with torture survivors and is also a minister and he found himself wondering... if those survivors showed up at his church, what would they think of the theology he espoused? would they find it naive? would they find it deep and meaningful?
I thought of Mariella at Art Night last week talking about someone saying that your theology shouldn't be anything you "can't say in front of burning children."

I Googled just now for [theology "burning children"] and yay, GoogleBooks.
Irving Greenberg's principle that no statement, theological or other, can be made "that would not be credible in the presence of the burning children."9 (p. 128, Long night's journey into day: a revised retrospective on the Holocaust by Alice Eckardt & Arthur Roy Eckardt)
9. Greenberg, "Cloud of Smoke," p. 23
[which I think (doing more GoogleBooks search) is: Irving Greenberg, "Cloud of Smoke, Pillar of Fire: Judaism, Christianity and Modernity after the Holocaust," in Auschwitz: Beginning of a New Era? ed. Eva Fleischner (New York: KTAV, 1997), pp. 1-55]
... Possibly I have a new reading project? /o\? In skimming through the footnotes, Moltmann's Crucified God got referenced a lot, and yeah...

P.S. Regular Google got me a top hit of a blogpost that opens with the quotation:
“No statement, theological or otherwise, should be made that would not be credible in the presence of burning children.” Irving Greenberg
But now I have a booklist. So that's a win, right?

+

Other notes:

At the v. beginning of service, there were only 4 of us. Keith had set the circle for 10 (including Tara's seat behind the keyboard). I thought about how I really liked when Rest and Bread was small and how now it being small is mixed with sad feelings for me -- missing the people who aren't here (though some of the people I was missing seeing showed up in the next few minutes) and also feeling like, "We made changes to this service, and so it's no longer the service that brought me into this church, and if all that change is for nothing I'm gonna be pissed."

Once the seats had filled up, I thought of the Passover tradition of leaving an empty chair for Elijah and thought, "Leaving an empty chair indicates symbolically that this space is always open to new/more people, that there is always enough space for more people."

We actually ended up having to pull out 2 more chairs as people trickled in.
hermionesviolin: Rabbit (from Winne the Pooh) holding a piece of paper, looking at Piglet, who is talking to them (in a gen way i swear)
This is why we are bffs.  DTR followed by research into perpetual virginity of Mary Mother of Jesus, leading to assorted AUs, also involving Thomas the Twin (largely thanks to Prof. Koester's class last night).  "Kate.  Short for Bob."

References from the evening:
* Oh Ephraem of Syria No
* "creative nonfiction"
* "sex on the Sabbath is a double mitzvah" (see also, Kita)
* dragon IN LUV

Edit: Bracketing my evening:

Before phonecall, Melissa said, "You'll appreciate that Echo Bazaar just had the phrase 'All shall be well; all manner of things shall be well' -- though I'm not sure how all will be well, since I just killed seven people."
me: "God's grace is sufficient?"

After phonecall, I got called in as resident Biblical scholar to settle a pomegranate vs. fig forbidden fruit question (I said I had primarily heard pomegranate -- Wikipedia indicates there is no consensus and many other options besides).  Melissa informed me that Jewish tradition says pomegranates have 613 seeds.  [613 always makes me think of this blogpost.]
hermionesviolin: black-and-white image of a church in the background, with sheep of different colors in the foreground, text at the top "Religion is a Queer Thing" and text at the bottom "Cambridge Welcoming Ministries" (religion is a queer thing)
I'm mostly good at asking whomever I'm eating with for a timeout so I can say a silent grace over my food -- when I'm in a one-on-one situation, anyway.  I've mostly stopped telling the other person that they can go ahead and eat, because people always reply by insisting that no they'll wait.  I'm not good at timeout-requesting when I'm with a group, though -- which is problematic because I'm really bad at tuning out noise around me.  I went to a luncheon today, and when I arrived, a couple people were already talking, and I sat down and bowed my head and folded my hands in front of my face and the longer I sat there trying to say grace, the more I wanted to either pick up my food and move to a quieter part of the room to say grace or literally ask them to stop talking for a minute.

So the question I posed to facebook: Is it gauche to, in a secular setting, ask the people eating with you to stop talking so you can say a silent grace over your food?
hermionesviolin: black-and-white image of a church in the background, with sheep of different colors in the foreground, text at the top "Religion is a Queer Thing" and text at the bottom "Cambridge Welcoming Ministries" (religion is a queer thing)
Thanks to a conversation with a friend, I now want a website with the official polity, judicial precedent, etc. of all denominations on full inclusion of GLBT persons (ordination, membership, etc.).
hermionesviolin: photoshoot image of Michelle Trachtenberg (who plays Dawn in the tv show Buffy) looking seriously (angrily?) at the viewer, with bookshelves in the background (angry - books)
I am thus far underwhelmed by (and sometimes outright fail-boggled by) Barbara Cawthorne Crafton's book Jesus Wept: When Faith and Depression Meet.  I don't even know what I want a Christian book on mental illness to do or say or include (so I don't know how I would even begin writing one myself -- even leaving aside the issue that, as someone who doesn't have any mental illness, I don't think I should be the one to write that book) but thus far I am not finding it.
hermionesviolin: a close-up crop of a Laurel Long illustration of a lion, facing serenely to one side (Aslan)
"a blessing does not confer holiness.  The holiness is already there"
    -Barbara Brown Taylor, An Altar in the World: A Geography of Faith (p. 203)

I'd never thought of it that way before.

Later in the chapter ("12. The Practice of Pronouncing Blessings -- Benediction") the author talks about what it can do to us to bless everyone -- "Practice blessing something simply because it exists alongside you and find out what your mind does with that exercise.  [...]  Notice what happens inside you as the blessing goes out of you, toward something that does not deserve it, that may even repel it.  If you can bless a stinking dump, surely someone can bless you" (p. 203).

I thought of her invitation in an earlier chapter ("6. The Practice of Encountering Others -- Community") to meet the eyes of the people we encounter (e.g. cashiers), to take a moment to really recognize them as human.  And ("4. The Practice of Walking on the Earth -- Groundedness") her invitation to be aware of our physical surroundings, to be attentive to them and to see them as beautiful.

And I was also reminded of Namaste -- "The Divine in me recognizes and honors, the Divine in you."

So as I headed home after work today I made it a point to try to actually look at each person who passed me or whom I passed or who was near me and to think, "I bless you."

I did not have any profound reaction to the experience, but I know that it is good for me to practice reminding myself that ALL PEOPLE are beloved children of God.

"When Christians speak of the mystery of the incarnation, this is what they mean: for reasons beyond anyone's understanding, God has decided to be made known in flesh.  Matter matters to God.  The most ordinary things are drenched in divine possibility.  Pronouncing blessings upon them is the least we can do" (p. 201).

***
    I have a friend who did not sleep through the night for years because of a dreadful dream he had.  [...]
    One night---in the dream---it occurred to him that what the demon wanted from him was his blessing.  That was the only thing that would end the demon's agony.  That was the only thing that would make it go away.  So he opened the door with his guts on fire and his hands in front of his face.
    "I bless you," he said to the demon, "and I bid you go where God wants you to go."  But saying it once was not enough.  He had to say it over and over again, as many different ways as he could think of to say it, for what seemed in the dream like close to an hour.  It was as if the demon could not get enough of the blessing.  It was as if no one had ever blessed him before.
    "I bless you," my friend said for the hundredth time, "now go in peace."  Making a sound like a kitten, the demon turned around and never came back.
    This last piece of wisdom may be only for those who are very advanced at blessing prayers, but what most of them say is that pronouncing a blessing puts you as close to God as you can get.  To learn to look with compassion on everything that is; to see past the terrifying demons outside to the bawling hearts within; to make the first move toward the other, however many time as it takes to get close; to open your arms to what is instead of waiting until it is what it should be; to surrender the justice of your own cause for mercy; to surrender the priority of your own safety for love---this is to land at God's breast.
    ExpandRead more... )
hermionesviolin: a close-up crop of a Laurel Long illustration of a lion, facing serenely to one side (Aslan)
    Vilma disappeared down a hall.  In a few minutes, she emerged from the back of the house with the mirror off a dresser.  "See," she said, "this is the mirror of your grandmother.  She was so sure you would come that she did not pray.  She put your pictures on this mirror and looked at them every day so she would not forget you."  In a ring around the mirror were dozens of my baby pictures, from birth to age two, copies of the same photos my mother had in her albums.
    I like to think God might be like this: a presence whom we have never seen---perhaps do not know exists---but who has loved us from the beginning.  Who puts, on a mirror, images of us at our most tender and vulnerable and wants us to be well, to thrive, and to be protected from harm.  I like to imagine God with her wrinkled, freckled face peering at us, remembering us, loving us, hoping for us, embracing us with a twinkling gaze of joy and concern, without our ever needing to know.  God's presence in that moment was my grandmother's smiling face welcoming me home from far away.
    I realized I belonged to people who had embraced me without question, without ever knowing me personally.  They simply accepted that I existed and that they should take care of me.  The love was enormous and amorphous, untied to me personally, yet able to encompass me when I appeared.

    -Rita Nakashima Brock, in Proverbs of Ashes: Violence, Redemptive Suffering, and the Search for What Saves Us (pp.232-233)
hermionesviolin: ((hidden) wisdom)
So, Molly sent this to the FCS listserv, and I sent it on to my best friend (though I'm sure she already knows it).  Because we are us, I gender-inclusified it, though I wasn't sure how to make "patriarchs and matriarchs" -- my improvement from "patriarchs" -- non-gender-binary.  I am also open to input about whether the usage of hearing/seeing reads as ableist.  Last caveat: the references to pagans, witches, etc. make me uncomfortable; my way around it is that it's just listing places from whence people might act to oppose you, but I'm not entirely sold on that.  Comments welcome.

    St. Patrick's Breastplate

    I arise today
    Through a mighty strength, the invocation of the Trinity,
    Through the belief in the threeness,
    Through confession of the oneness
    Of the Creator of Creation.

    I arise today
    Through the strength of Christ's birth with hir baptism,
    Through the strength of hir crucifixion with hir burial,
    Through the strength of hir resurrection with hir ascension,
    Through the strength of hir descent for the judgment of Doom.

    I arise today
    Through the strength of the love of Cherubim,
    In obedience of angels,
    In the service of archangels,
    In hope of resurrection to meet with reward,
    In prayers of patriarchs and matriarchs ancestors,
    In predictions of prophets,
    In preaching of apostles,
    In faith of confessors,
    In innocence of holy virgins,
    In deeds of righteous persons.

    I arise today
    Through the strength of heaven:
    Light of sun,
    Radiance of moon,
    Splendor of fire,
    Speed of lightning,
    Swiftness of wind,
    Depth of sea,
    Stability of earth,
    Firmness of rock.

    I arise today
    Through God's strength to pilot me:
    God's might to uphold me,
    God's wisdom to guide me,
    God's eye to look before me,
    God's ear to hear me,
    God's word to speak for me,
    God's hand to guard me,
    God's way to lie before me,
    God's shield to protect me,
    God's host to save me
    From snares of devils,
    From temptations of vices,
    From everyone who shall wish me ill,
    Afar and anear,
    Alone and in multitude.

    I summon today all these powers between me and those evils,
    Against every cruel merciless power that may oppose my body and soul,
    Against incantations of false prophets,
    Against black laws of pagandom
    Against false laws of heretics,
    Against craft of idolatry,
    Against spells of witches and smiths and wizards,
    Against every knowledge that corrupts one's body and soul.

    Christ to shield me today
    Against poison, against burning,
    Against drowning, against wounding,
    So that there may come to me abundance of reward.

    Christ with me, Christ before me, Christ behind me,
    Christ in me, Christ beneath me, Christ above me,
    Christ on my right, Christ on my left,
    Christ when I lie down, Christ when I sit down, Christ when I arise,
    Christ in the heart of everyone who thinks of me,
    Christ in the mouth of everyone who speaks of me,
    Christ in every eye that sees me,
    Christ in every ear that hears me.

    I arise today
    Through a mighty strength, the invocation of the Trinity,
    Through belief in the threeness,
    Through confession of the oneness,
    Of the Creator of Creation.

Tikkun Olam

Jan. 6th, 2010 09:39 pm
hermionesviolin: text "a land flowing with milk and honey" (abundance)
One of the professors I work for sent me a PDF document to print out for him and commented that I might be interested.  One of its bullet points references “Arvut Hadadit" and “Tikkun Olam” and so of course I Googled them.  One of the top-listed results for the second term was a 2007 article.  Excerpt:
Rather than reject the term altogether as meaningless, I suggest a re-imagining of tikkun olam that combines the four understandings of the term that we have seen in traditional text: 1) the Aleynu’s concept of tikkun as the destruction of any impurities that impede the full manifestation of the divine presence; 2) the literalist midrashic understanding of tikkun olam as the establishment of a sustainable world; 3) the rabbinic willingness to invoke tikkun ha’olam as a justification for changing untenable laws; and 4) the Lurianic belief that individual actions can affect the fate of the world as a whole.
  • From the Aleynu conception, our understanding of tikkun olam will include an emphasis on the elimination of evil and the restoration of the world to a perfected divine state.
  • The midrashic emphasis on the physical maintenance of creation reminds us of the need to work to preserve the world at a time when human behavior is having a negative impact on global temperatures, hurricane systems, and other natural phenomena
  • The rabbinic understanding of tikkun ha’olam as the creation of a workable social and religious system leads to a definition of tikkun olam as a mandate to correct the systems that make our own society dysfunctional.
  • Finally, the Lurianic belief that individual actions can have a permanent effect on the cosmos offers hope that our efforts toward tikkun will succeed.
These four strands, though complementary in some ways, also remain in tension with one another in some other important ways. The Aleynu prayer has the potential to direct Jews toward an inward focus on connecting with God and on spreading divinity through less tangible means, such as prayer or basic kindness, rather than through attention to more concrete human needs. The midrashic focus on the physical maintenance of the world might lead to an emphasis only on issues that affect the physical world – such as global warming, deforestation, or the extinction of animal species—and a concurrent disregard for human problems, such as poverty and health concerns. The rabbinic attention to fixing loopholes that disrupt the legal and social system may limit the definition of tikkun olam to issues that are understood to interfere with the large-scale functioning of society to the exclusion of issues that primarily affect a certain segment of the population. The Lurianic emphasis on the restoration of divine wholeness easily leads to an otherworldly focus, and a minimization of one’s sense of obligation toward the here and now.

By combining the major themes of these four strands, we come to a definition of tikkun olam as the process of fixing large societal problems, while maintaining a belief that our actions can have a positive effect on the greater human and divine world. When I think about my own tikkun olam commitments, I ask myself whether the work I am doing makes our society, as a whole function in a more positive way; whether the work allows even the most vulnerable members of society to live fully realized lives; and whether the work contributes to establishing a world in which the divine presence is more readily apparent. If we each ask these questions of ourselves, we can help to ensure that our work is worthy of being deemed tikkun olam.
If we each ask these questions of ourselves, we can help to ensure that our work is worthy of being deemed tikkun olam.

***

One of the articles on the sidebar was "Why I Study Sabbateanism."  In discussing Jacob Frank, the author writes: "If you see a boundary, cross it - that's the view, because it's what God did, mixing Godself with the impurity of the material world."  I was a little thrown to hear a Jewish writer saying this, because hello Christian Incarnationalism, but of course the God of Abraham has been coming down and dwelling amidst God's people since Creation.
hermionesviolin: (light in the darkness)
So, Tiffany asked me, "please let me know which texts you want read (knowing you, I suspect all 4) and if you have any hymns or other pieces of liturgy (call to worship, prayers, etc) that you want included. The whole bulletin is open for you to write. Just let me know how much or how little you want to do."

My instinctual first choice was "I was there to hear your borning cry," except I looked up the words and really I only want the first verse.  ("In a blaze of light you wandered off to find where demons dwell" is BRILLIANT -- especially for Baptism of Jesus Sunday.  The Temptation in the Wilderness immediately follows the Baptism.)  The rest of the song is very meh (and wow have I become That Person -- I read "If you find someone to share your time and you join your hearts as one," and thought, "That excludes polyamorous people").

Anyway, my heart is made of stone because apparently lots of people just sob through this hymn -- because it evokes for them their earthly parent/child relationship.  Which is a totally sensible reading of the beginning of the hymn -- even though I think I consistently hear the speaker as the Divine Parent.  And it is a moving hymn (even though I wish the poetry were better).  But yeah.

I reread "She Comes Sailing on the Wind" (and actually didn't register the male pronouns for Jesus on the first read-through -- I mean, I understood the implied referent, but I didn't have a negative reaction to Jesus being gendered as male as I am more and more these days) and like it.  Though I feel a little bit weird using it for Baptism of Jesus Sunday.
hermionesviolin: Rabbit (from Winne the Pooh) holding a piece of paper, looking at Piglet, who is talking to them (in a gen way i swear)
ExpandRead more... )

***

We both sort of kept up with our Internets over the weekend, but I still feel really disconnected.  I did go back through my flist/Inbox today and bookmark all the Yuletide recs I was likely to read.

Throughout the day on Monday I crisscrossed the city, so today is a quieter day.  Though given that I got ~11hrs of sleep last night, possibly it is not the best choice that I'm not leaving the house until my 5:30pm haircut.  I washed dishes but have not, for example, worked on my sermon any.
hermionesviolin: (light in the darkness)
At morning prayer this morning, our hymn was "With Joy Draw Water" (which at least is quasi-Advent) and the lectionary readings were Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Hebrews 10:10-18.

Nobody had much of anything to say during the Reflection time and then Billy (who has not impressed me with his intelligence, etc. thus far this Advent) asked what "Jesse's tree" is.

I said Jesse was either David's father or son, said, "I can't believe I don't know this -- I was just reading the genealogies recently." I skimmed the Matthean and Lukan genealogies and Jesse's name didn't jump out at me, and Joan(?) said something about Solomon, and I flipped back to the books of Samuel (at this point I had processed my memories of the few episodes of Kings I had seen and was certain that Jesse was David's parent) and started skimming those and said, "I am so ashamed that none of us know this." (Present were: Tim D., Ellie and Billy, Joan, me, and FCS-Ian.) I did find:
Samuel Anoints David

God said to Samuel, ‘How long will you grieve over Saul? I have rejected him from being king over Israel. Fill your horn with oil and set out; I will send you to Jesse the Bethlehemite, for I have provided for myself a king among his sons.’
I was still ashamed that I didn't know where to look for Solomon (whom Wikipedia informs me is David's son -- which someone this morning had suggested).

***

In other news, FCS-Ian doesn't have work next week and neither does Joan, so there is talk of post-prayer breakfast. Which I could do if I went to the gym on my lunch hour.
hermionesviolin: a close-up crop of a Laurel Long illustration of a lion, facing serenely to one side (Aslan)
Discussing atonement theology, we have also talked about the Fall, which led to talk about Creation, and after I referenced C. S. Lewis' Perelandra, I ended up talking about "God on a learning curve" and Creation/creativity/"Look, I am doing a new thing" and my faith journey (all of these in brief and not elaborated -- or even cited -- since in theory I was going to bed) and quoted Dar Williams --

'cause when you live in a world
Well it gets in to who you thought you'd be
And now I laugh at how the world changed me
I think life chose me after all
hermionesviolin: black background with red animated typing the "blood and rhetoric" bit from R&G Are Dead -- ending "Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." (blood)
Lorraine and Heidi asked me about my/CWM's discomfort with atonement theology. My best friend and my mother sent me emails with follow-up thoughts. I've been thinking about this a lot. (And in looking back at that comment thread, this post still doesn't respond to a lot of what Heidi and Lorraine asked.)

I think it is True that Christ allowed Christself to be executed, that Christ shed blood and tears, that Christ was willing to suffer all this for the disciples who didn't understand and for all humanity. I think this willing sacrifice is really powerful. What I'm really uncomfortable with is the idea (which I think is perpetuated in a lot of the ways that the story is told) that God REQUIRED this sacrifice in order to reconcile Creation to Godself. What does it say that the spilling of innocent blood is necessary to bridge that gap between Creator and Creation?

***

I recently came across a blogpost titled "Vampires & crosses." An excerpt:
Vampire stories tell us, for example, than any of us can have great power if only we are willing to prey on others. Feed off the blood of others and great power will be yours. This is demonstrably true. It's how the pyramids were built. And Standard Oil.

The stories also tell us that there's a downside to this predatory choice. You become a creature of the night, unable to stand in the light of day.

And crosses will confound you.

Some mistakenly think that this is because the cross is a holy symbol, imbued with religious power. But this is wrong. The symbol, like the thing itself, is powerless. And that's the point. That is why vampires can't tolerate it.

Most vampires don't believe in the cross, but that hardly matters. It's the idea of the thing that gives them fits. The cross confronts vampires with their opposite -- with the rejection of power and its single-minded pursuit. It suggests that no one is to be treated as prey -- not even an enemy. The idea of the cross, in other words, suggests that vampires have it wrong, that they have it backwards, in fact, and that those others they regard as prey are actually, somehow, winning.

This notion is incomprehensible for vampires. The one thing they're certain of, the thing that drives them and tells them who they are and how the world works and that they've got it all figured out is that the key to immortality is in choosing to be the predator rather than the prey. The idea that this might be wrong is so befuddling, so contradictory to everything they have chosen to be that it forces them to recoil. They can't get past it.
This is somewhat reminiscent of the "when love comes to town" excerpt I posted on September 11th:
  • And that is precisely what [Renee] Girrard describes in his work regarding scapegoats: pinning all of our hatred and fear on the scapegoat always unifies a society - but only for a season - and then more violence is needed to bind people together. Further, societies rarely consider the consequences of scapegoating - history is never told from the perspective of our victims - so we rarely feel remorse or act in repentance.
  • Which is why the story and reality of Jesus is unique: for the first time, Girrard suggests, history is told from the perspective of the innocent scapegoat. For the first time we can see the horrible consequences of our violence. Indeed, what makes the passion of Christ so important in NOT the horrible violence a la Mel Gibson. That, sadly, is all to ordinary. No, what makes the passion life changing is the awareness that Christ died to expose this horrible sin and invite us - with God's grace - to stop it.
***

During Communion at Rest and Bread last night, Laura Ruth said, "This is my body, given for you," and "This is the cup of the new covenant, poured out for you." While this has even less "broken bodies save souls" than last week did, it leaves me screaming even more, "WHY DO WE DO THIS?" When I gave her my Convo 2007 DVDs after service, she said, "You sent me a long email, and I don't even know what it said, because I've been up past my eyeballs, but that will be over soon." I laughed and said okay.

I emailed Laura Ruth today (hyperlinks not in original):
You are still not obligated to read/respond to any of this -- just fyi.

I've been having conversations with various people about atonement theology and Communion, further figuring out what it is that I believe.

I really like using the traditional Words of Institution (or a close approximation thereto), and it sometimes makes me uncomfortable when we rewrite them so wholesale at CWM (though it feels organic and appropriate to CWM, so even when it does bother me, it bothers me less than it would in other contexts). But I want more. If all we say is, "This is my blood, the blood of the new covenant, poured out for many, for the forgiveness of sins," then I'm left saying, "So God requires innocent blood in order to forgive? And what is this new covenant anyway?"

I went to Sunday morning service at Somerville Community Baptist this past Sunday, and in their Communion liturgy they used the phrase, "Proclaim Christ's death until He comes again," and in thinking about it today, I thought, "But Jesus says "Remember ME," not "I'm going to die soon, and you should remember THAT." " (Okay, okay, when I actually Googled "Words of Institution," it's all "do this in remembrance of me," which sounds very much like a memorial... which just doesn't sit right with me, since WE ARE A RESURRECTION PEOPLE *cough* I have perhaps internalized Tiffany's Easter sermon ... anyway, the relevant chapter in Mark Allan Powell's book Loving Jesus has given me a lot to think about re: the idea of expectantly waiting for Christ's return, but I still incline more toward a focus on "Christ is with us now" than "Christ will come again" -- when we sing "Christ has died, Christ is ris'n..." that's CWM's alternative for the third phrase.)

In my various churches, I hear a lot of talk about coming to the Table to be nourished -- both spiritually and physically. I've never actually experienced this at Communion, because it's a bite of bread and a sip of juice/wine (not an actual meal) and the story doesn't tell me how it is that I am spiritually nourished/fed (or reconciled) through this experience -- I who grew up very low church Protestant where God is ALWAYS accessible to you. And I'm not asking for Communion to become a meaningful powerful experience for me. I have a Bible full of texts to wrestle with, and I live in a world full of grace and full of pain. (Earlier today I came across a quotation I'd forgotten -- "If the world was merely seductive, that would be easy. If it were merely challenging, that would be no problem. But I arise in the morning torn between a desire to improve the world and a desire to enjoy the world. That makes it hard to plan the day." –E.B. White) I have so so much.

But I so want church to be accessible to and meaningful for people, and I think, "What stories are we telling people? What stories are we embodying? How are we helping people to touch the face of God?" (Did I ever tell you that my best friend's pastor once said, "we go to church every week because we touch the face of God"?)

And so I think, What if after we recited the words from the Bible (the Words of Institution), we said, "And Jesus said: Whenever you do this, remember me. And so we do remember. We remember Jesus' ministry of sitting down at table and sharing a meal with the outcasts and the religious elite. We remember Jesus' body being broken by the authorities, and we remember the tomb being broken open. We remember the suffering and the resurrection. And in this meal, the fruits of the earth broken open for us, we remember and we are nourished for the journey that lies ahead."

Um, I'm not sure when I turned into someone who actually writes liturgy?

Love,
Elizabeth

Profile

hermionesviolin: an image of Alyson Hannigan (who plays Willow Rosenberg) with animated text "you think you know / what you are / what's to come / you haven't even / BEGUN" (Default)
Elizabeth (the delinquent, ecumenical)

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Style Credit

Page generated Sep. 7th, 2025 03:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios