hermionesviolin: (step into the light)
I ended up on some local Indivisible list and saw a post from last month that asserts there's value in calling your federal congressionals' DC and local office, because they don't cross-reference the call lists across offices and "Every single day, the Senior Staff and the Senator get a report of the 3 most-called-about topics for that day at each of their offices (in DC and local offices), and exactly how many people said what about each of those topics."

(This post also reiterates the advice I have seen elsewhere to only talk about 1 issue per call -- I think because of the way calls get tallied.)

I had been thinking of phonecalls as like, "Okay, I told my elected what I thought on this issue and now they know that and I shouldn't call again on future days unless it's REALLY important," but this is motivating me to call more often about stuff.

A longer excerpt of the post is behind the cut. (I also cross-posted this to [community profile] thisfinecrew.) ExpandRead more... )
hermionesviolin: CJ Cregg from the West Wing, sitting in her office looking thoughtful/concerned (Claudia Jean)
Dunno if it was the accumulation of everything, but the under-19 trans care ban tonight hit me harder than I was expecting.

I appreciate Chris Geidner on this:
There will be challenges, and Law Dork will have coverage of them. It is, however, a failure of humanity, governing, advocacy, and journalism that we have gotten to this point.

Those who were insistently “just asking questions” and unceasingly pushing the needle further right — in addition to those who encouraged and then exploited that for their explicitly discriminatory or hateful aims — all bear a measure of responsibility for this, for making trans teens — and, with them, trans adults — fear for their lives tonight.
hermionesviolin: (hard at work)
When my partner early voted this general election and posted a selfie, they said:
This isn’t the last time, right? /r

To be fair, I’m confident I’ll vote again. Autocracy regularly wraps itself in a shroud of false democracy.



I feel like every year, the presidential election galvanizes people, but people often don't find out about stuff until it's too late for them to get involved and/or people's energy doesn't carry through the rest of the year.

I got really into GOTV postcarding this season, and closer to the election I started writing up about the postcarding I'd done with different orgs. And then election results came in and I did not feel enthused about evangelizing this work to people. But postcard campaigns for runoff/special elections have started, and I continue to like writing GOTV postcards as a way to potentially make a difference.




This year I wrote GOTV postcards with both Postcards to Swing States (A Progressive Turnout Project Initiative) and Reclaim Our Vote (Center for Common Ground).  (I learned about the latter from a [community profile] thisfinecrew post about a number of postcarding and letter-writing options.)

ExpandRead more... )

I think ROV is the org I most appreciate writing for -- it feels really impactful.

Postcards to Swing States is definitely the lowest barrier-to-entry one.




Tues Dec 10, I got an email from Postcards to Swing States that included, "Here's a preview of what we'll share on the December 19 webinar: [...] Some of our early plans for postcard campaigns beginning almost immediately" 

I am not interested in attending the webinar, but I look forward to hearing about the postcarding.  I then looked up Postcards to Voters' Current and they're doing postcards for a VA special election Jan 7 [Kannan Srinivasan, VA, Senate District 32 -- I Googled for more information and got e.g. this], so I made myself a Todoist to sign up for postcards for that.

Expandmore about Postcards to Voters )
hermionesviolin: (hard at work)
I don't watch Election Night coverage, so I woke up Wednesday morning, checked my phone, said, "Jesus!" and got up.

Wednesday's an anchor day for my department, and it didn't occur to me to WFH, but I was aware that the moving my body of biking to work would probably be good for me.

Most of the day I felt numb and kind of tired. I already felt like I didn't have the energy for all the stuff I wanted to be doing. I don't wanna have to do this again -- and I have so much privilege that I was largely protected last time (and will be again), even as I know it's gonna be so much worse this time and so my engagement is even more necessary.

A coworker reserved a conference room to have a space for queer staff over lunchtime.  I wasn't sure how much I wanted to be in groups of people.  I sat outside for a half an hour in the unreasonably warm sun and ate my lunch and then headed inside, feeling fortified by having eaten some food and gotten some sunshine.  It was a small group of people I already know and like, and it generally felt good to be there.

That night, my church hosted a dinner and worship service.  Once again, not something I felt like I needed or was actively seeking, but it felt generally good to be there.

Thursday I started reaching out to other people to check in.  Wednesday I could barely bring myself to do so, and was mostly not on social media.

It's now Friday and I'm starting to feel back to normal -- which is scary in a way, because complacency is so easy to slip into (especially since I'm so shielded by privilege).

The looming prospect of 4 more years of 2016-2020 (only turbocharged) feels so big and overwhelming.  There's been a lot about focusing on building networks/community/capacity locally -- plugging into orgs that already exist, not spreading yourself too thin (there will always be more to do than you can do).  One of the things I can do fairly consistently is give money, and I'm reminding myself to live into my belief that just giving money to people in need is valuable and often the most effective.  (Obviously systems are also important, and in the absence of the government doing that work, giving money to the private sector can often be valuable -- though pressuring the government to provide/improve services is also important in tandem.)  The Queer Exchange Boston FB group is always filled with posts asking for money, which tends to feel overwhelming to me, but I can give to one person/day.

Every time something Big happens, some folks post reminders that the Big Orgs (Planned Parenthood, ACLU, etc.) get lots of money and there are tons of local orgs that do critical work and really struggle for funding.  So in case it's helpful, I thought I'd share a list of some of the places I have recurring donations at (though some of them are definitely bigger orgs).  Building this list, it occurs to me that I should probably find at least one trans rights focused organization.

Recurring donations -- even small ones -- are so helpful to organizations to be able to plan their work/budgets.  A lot of places I give $18/month -- because of Jewish numerology (it means "life" and represents good luck and so Jews will often give gifts in multiples of 18) -- but places will appreciate even $5/month or $20/year or whatever you can give.  (Recurring donations also take the mental load off of you -- it's work you're doing that you don't have to think about -- though okay, you do need to remember to include it in your budgeting.)

abortion
[You can find lists of abortion funds on the Internet, e.g. WRRAP's -- though because that list is aimed at people seeking abortion support, it lists multiple National organizations for each state, which is less helpful if you're trying to support a local org. I know Mariame Kaba has been uplifting the Palmetto State Abortion Fund in South Carolina.]
voting
  • Fair Fight -- Stacey Abrams' Georgia-based nonprofit fighting voter suppression & protecting voting rights
  • Florida Rights Restoration Coalition (FRRC) -- which helps formerly incarcerated persons in Florida regain their right to vote (after Florida's Amendment 4 passed in 2018, which removed the lifetime ban on voting for most people with past felony convictions, but whose implementation has really been hampered)

Palestine
mutual aid
  • MAMAS (Mutual Aid Medford and Somerville)
  • Whose Corner Is It Anyway -- "Whose Corner Is It Anyway is a Western MA mutual aid, harm reduction, political education, and organizing group led by stimulant and opioid using low-income, survival, or street-based sex workers, founded in 2017. All members are current or former low income sex working cis or trans women or gender diverse people. All members either use/have used stimulants and/or opioids, are/have been homeless, or work/ have worked outside."

other

ugh, ACLUM

Jul. 26th, 2024 11:00 am
hermionesviolin: black and white image of Ani DiFranco with text "i fight fire with words" (i fight fire with words)
Okay, I know I've complained before about the ACLU of Massachusetts form to contact legislators, but this morning I got an email from them ("5 days left; 5 bills to pass!") about 5 bills to try to get through before the legislative session ends on July 31 and the unchangeable Message Recipients are "Your State Senator, Your State Representatives" but I know at least one of these bills has already unanimously passed the House! (Because my State Rep emailed to tell me so earlier this month as a follow-up to an email thread we'd had earlier this season in which I was asking her to support the bill.)

And there's almost no information for ME about the bills so that I could, yanno, elaborate more personally about why these bills are important to me or what impact they would have that I'm concerned about or whatever.

The email to me says:
For this action, we're asking lawmakers to act on five key issues:
  • Ban the sale of cellphone location data.
  • Rein in face surveillance.
  • Address the opioid crisis.
  • Pass the Parentage Act.
  • Tackle maternal health inequities.
The form email to the legislators says:
As your constituent, I urge you to take the following steps before the session ends:

1. Address the opioid crisis using an evidence-based, public health approach - We need to use every available tool to save lives.

2. Tackle inequities in maternal health - Expand access to midwifery care, birth centers, and other reproductive health care services.

3. Pass the Parentage Act - Don't let these long-overdue reforms slip through the cracks! It's time to protect all children and families in Massachusetts.

4. Ban the sale of cellphone location data - This predatory practice puts us all at risk of surveillance and harassment, especially domestic violence survivors.

5. Rein in government use of facial recognition - Pass commonsense safeguards that have been vetted and are ready to go.
So, just off the cuff:

#4. Per my Rep, "H.4844, An Act Providing Protections for Reproductive or Gender-Affirming Care Location Information, has passed unanimously in the House [on July 10] and will now be sent over to the Senate."

#3. I Googled the Parentage Act, which I thought had also passed, and there's a June 12, 2024 press release that says, "Having passed the House of Representatives 156-0, the bill now goes to the Senate for its consideration."

Yes, I should definitely email my Senator about those -- but I'm not gonna form email my Senator AND Rep to ask them to pass these bills when one of those people has already fucking passed the bill.

I'm honestly not even sure what specific bills these other numbers are referencing. I looked up ALCUM's legislative priorities for this session, and "opioid" isn't on that page, so idk what #1 is about, and I really don't love making vague asks of my legislators.

#2, I think is probably re: "Birthing Justice & Maternal Health Equity (S.1415)"

Okay, re: #5, there is very helpfully: "Facial Recognition Commission Recommendations (H.1728/S.927) | Learn More | Testimony | Take Action!"

3 bills

Apr. 9th, 2024 02:12 pm
hermionesviolin: black and white image of Ani DiFranco with text "i fight fire with words" (i fight fire with words)
I have written emails to my state rep/senator about 3 different bills today and am (1) very judgy about ways action centers handle their email templates, and (2) amazed by the amount of email legislators must get.

(1) This ACLU form doesn't even let you edit the entirety of the form message! [For that one and another one, I copied the draft text into an email document and edited/sent it that way -- since I have my state-level people's email addresses; as opposed to federal level folks who I usually have to go through a website form regardless.]

Also, I want them to link to the Cosponsor page of the House/Senate bill so you can check if your legislator is already a Petitioner. (Spoilers: my congresscritters had already signed on as Petitioners for all 3 bills I was writing to ask them to support. I'm still gonna email saying, "Thanks for supporting this bill; this issue is important to me" -- but that's different from saying, "Please support this bill; this issue is important to me." I don't know if my emails get extra credence because I appear to have paid more attention, but even if they don't, I still want to be thoughtful and accurate -- and leaders tend to only get criticism, so it also feels like best practice to send supportive emails where applicable.)

[Edit: Okay, I'm now looking through the ACLU of Massachusetts’ priorities for the 2023-2024 legislative session, and it occurs to me that I wish email form letter systems also sent me a copy of the email I sent -- because, like, I think I maybe already sent an email about "End Immigration Detention Agreements (H.1401/S.997)" but I'm not sure?

Oh, I went back in my notes and last Friday I'd action network emailed about the Safe Communities Act S.1510/H.2288 -- which would limit voluntary police and court involvement in federal immigration enforcement, so that's related, but different, apparently. And both emails I'd form sent on Friday were emailing a committee to ask them to vote a bill favorably out of committee before the deadline -- which is something that using a form email for makes a lot of sense to me.]

(2) I am only 1 person, and I wrote 3 emails in 1 day! Thanks to action emails I'd gotten on April 2, 7, and 9 -- so they easily could have been sent more spread out if I'd been more on top of this, but still...
hermionesviolin: image of The Thinker with text "Liberal Arts Major: will ponder for food" (will ponder for food)
After the January 6th attack on the Capitol, a coworker (M) started a political Conversations informal Zoom. I'm not super-hype about the power of Conversations (is this influenced by the sealioning that someone routinely does on Thom's FB posts? sure is), but last month they were doing one on defunding the police, and so of course I showed up, and now I'm on the email list.

Last week they did one on mass incarceration (though the prep material was rather wide-ranging -- a podcast on the Roots of Mass Incarceration; a brief documentary about a supermax prison one state over, which just recently closed; and a Last Week Tonight with John Oliver on overheating in prisons).

We had a pretty wide-ranging conversation, and someone (D) talked about how a friend had fundraised for a (iirc) Black trans woman who was incarcerated in Vermont and had completed her sentence but couldn't be released until she had a permanent address to be released to. This sounds kind of fake to me, and Googling isn't really helping, so I wonder if something got lost in translation. But the point is, D. talked about how that giving money to help a person directly felt so much different than donating money to a political campaign to try to get someone elected who you hope will do what you wanted/they promised to help people in need.

On the theme of direct cash assistance, I pitched the Mass Bail Fund, because of who I am as a person.

That was Wednesday

On/around Juneteenth (Saturday), folks were talking about reparations, Nobody is free until we are ALL free, etc., and I donated to a Texas bail fund.

I have a recurring donation set up to the Mass Bail Fund, but given Juneteenth's origins in Texas, I wanted to donate somewhere specific to Texas.

In looking for a directory of bail funds by state, I had not realized that there were immigration bail funds in addition to pre-trial detenion bail funds. (Plus protest bail funds.)

***

I've been getting a significant uptick in political campaign donation solicitation emails recently, but really felt up for dealing with them #ThanksPandemicDepression

But today I opened and read this one:
ExpandCheri Beasley for North Carolina )
I then spent like 45 minutes composing this email to some friends:
Expandapparently this is the kind of thing I can/will summon up energy for? )
hermionesviolin: young black woman(?) with curly hair and pink sunglasses, facing away from the viewer (every week is ibarw)
I said on FB earlier today:
RTing lots of things about how red states are often only red (or even purple) due to aggressive voter suppression efforts has me thinking that probably orgs working against voter suppression are where I'll be investing in the near-term.

Also: reminder that, in fact, there are lots of progressive doing hard work in the states that we in places like Boston want to write off -- and lots of marginalized/oppressed folks living in those states, generally. So let's not make glib comments about wishing The South would secede from the Union or whatever.
(Did I set up a recurring donation to Stacey Abrams' org Fair Fight today? Yup.)

Reading TruthOut's "How to Do More Than Panic About Voter Suppression" [from September 16, 2020], I was getting mad all over again about how the state legislature undid so much of Florida's (21018) Amendment 4.

Amendment 4 restored the right to vote to folks who had had a felony conviction*, but after it passed, the legislature added in a hoop that you had to pay all your fines and fees (or petition a judge to have them waived) before you could be allowed to register to vote (SB 7066).

* and who had served their sentence (including freaking probation/parole!), excluding the categories of felony convictions that squick people out (murder or felony sexual offense) -- it was like the Most, "these are just some good people who've done some bad things, but they've paid their debt to society"

I did some phone-banking for Amendment 4 back in 2018, so I'm on Florida Rights Restoration Coalition [FRRC]'s email list, but did I set up a recurring donation to them today? Yup!

It was interesting to notice in myself over the course of today a move from, "Yes, working against voter suppression," to, "Yes! Abolish the carceral police state!" Like, both of them are objectively important, but one of them is clearly where my more sustained efforts are gonna be. (Which should not really have surprised me. 😂)

I was reminded of Frederick Buechner's "The place God calls you to is the place where your deep gladness and the world's deep hunger meet." (from Wishful Thinking: A Seeker's ABC)

I mean, have I invested a lot in world-changing over the past 2 years? No. Do I think I will manage to invest a lot in the next 2 years? Also no. But I can maybe remind myself to do Some Things.
hermionesviolin: (ball failure)
I know everyone jokes about taking a nap and waking up to a half a dozen new giant news stories -- but I haven't been on social media much today (or recently) because work, and literally I opened up Twitter after I got home this evening and the first thread I saw included, "Also, is Elizabeth Warren supposed to have murdered or fucked a marine in a parking lot? Or both?? Frankly that would only raise her in my estimation."

Further down on my feed: "Imagine thinking that Liz Warren would be LESS cool if she had a BDSM affair with a 25 year old, muscular Marine" [link]

Also: "We live in an absurd world but zero things will be funnier today than a 25 year old marine claiming Senator Elizabeth Ann Warren outfucked him" [link]

What a time to be alive.

After seeing it RTed like 4 times, AND noticing #Cougar2020 in the trending Twitter sidebar, some minutes later it finally clicked for me why Elizabeth Warren had Tweeted, "It's always a good day to be reminded that I got where I am because a great education was available for $50 a semester at the University of Houston (go Cougars!). We need to cancel student debt and make college free for everyone who wants it." Good job, her social media team.

Addendum: Ej Dickson (author of Rolling Stone's "Elizabeth Warren Accuser ‘Not Up to Caliber’ to Work For Gigolo Agency"):
  • "So just to confirm, Elizabeth Warren was **not** a client at your male escort agency" is a thing that actually came out of my mouth on a phone call this afternoon
  • TLDR: @cowboys4angels is a real agency, I called up the guy who owns it and was like "does this dude work here" and he was like "no lol we'd never even hire him." so shame on you Jacob for smearing not just Warren but the company featured on Showtime's iconic series Gigolos
  • Thank you @brendan_klink for the chefs kiss hed
hermionesviolin: photoshoot image of Julie Benz (who played Darla on Buffy and Angel) blowing bubbles with text "I used to do this professionally" (Darla - professional)
(cross-posted to [community profile] thisfinecrew)

It was International Sex Worker Rights Day on Saturday (March 3) and I learned via Twitter that FOSTA ("Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act" -- H.R. 1865) passed the House and the Senate will vote on its version (SESTA -- "Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act," S. 1693) I think on March 12 though I can't now find where I found that date.

Not only do these bills conflate "sex trafficking" (which is unequivocally bad) with "sex work" (which, like all labor, can be variably exploitative/dangerous/etc. but which is in no way improved by criminalization), but it also "amends Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act to hold online publishers, apps, and services legally liable for the actions of people who post there or connect through them" (to quote a Reason article) -- 'cause who needs Internet safe harbor?

A brief phone script I saw on Twitter is: “Hi, my name is ___and I live in ___(city in district). I’m calling to urge Senator ____to vote NO on #SESTA, S. 1693 because it will lead to harm to people who trade sex, including victims of trafficking.”

If you'd rather, you could amend it to something like "because it weakens the important protections for online speech in Section 230." (more info from Electronic Frontier Foundation here -- written before the House vote)

If you're like me and want to do some more research to acquire some more talking points before you reach out to legislators (or your social media), behind the cut are some excerpts from some of the articles I've read in recent days. If folks are on Twitter, I'd encourage you to follow accounts like [twitter.com profile] swopbehindbars (SWOP = Sex Workers Outreach Project) [twitter.com profile] SupportSWRights [twitter.com profile] melissagira. For SESTA specifically, you can follow hashtags #LetUsSurvive #SurvivorsAgainstSESTA #StopSESTA.

ExpandRead more... )

I know FOSTA already passed the House, but I emailed my rep:
I was disappointed to learn you that voted in support of H.R. 1865. I know it was advertised as a bill to protect victims of sex trafficking, but if conflates sex trafficking (which is unequivocally bad) with prostitution (which, like all labor, can be variably exploitative/dangerous/etc. but which is in no way improved by criminalization). And its proposed Section 230 changes would hurt both sex workers and people who are trafficked by pushing sex work further underground, robbing sex workers of online communities within which they can warn and be warned about dangerous clients, etc. This bill has been opposed by many sex worker and free speech organizations (as well as survivors of trafficking https://injusticetoday.com/proposed-federal-trafficking-legislation-has-surprising-opponents-advocates-who-work-with-bf418c73d5b4). I hope that, moving forward, when voting on legislation impacting sex workers, you will seek out the voices of actual sex workers (e.g., SWOP -- Sex Worker Outreach Project).
Congress.gov is not the most user-friendly website, but the Feb 27 House vote on FOSTA is here if you want to reach out to your rep about how they voted on FOSTA.
hermionesviolin: image of The Thinker with text "Liberal Arts Major: will ponder for food" (will ponder for food)
The ASP season for next year came out last Wednesday. ExpandThe Downfall of Despots )

***

Last night, we saw a broadcast of the RSC's Tempest -- finishing out Shakespeare's jubilee year (2016 was the 400th anniversary of Shakespeare's death) with Shakespeare's last solo-authored play.

They had a teaser for ROME, and I thought it was just the next play they were doing, so I thought, "Julius Caesar? Or Antony and Cleopatra?"

No, it's the whole next season -- Julius Caesar, Antony and Cleopatra, Titus Andronicus, Coriolanus. I'm excited. I mean, I'm meh on the first 2 plays, but the RSC has done such amazing productions recently that I'm at least interested to see what they do (if nothing else, we'll get to see them make great use of their visual resources -- they have an amazing stage, and amazing amounts of money, so their productions honestly feel worth watching for that alone), and to see how they comment on our current political moment.

In talking about next season, Gregory Doran (Artistic Director of the RSC) was like, "In this post-Brexit, post-Trump," and he just kinda looked at the ground in sadness as he was talking. (In talking about Lear -- unwise breaking up of the kingdom -- IIRC he said that the Brexit vote happened the first day of rehearsals for the show.)

For their ROME season they're bringing back the director of Othello (I forget for which play, but I'm real excited about that -- they evoked Abu Ghraib in that one, so I look forward to any politically-engaged play under that director) and have a woman director for one of the plays (again, I forget which one, but good on you RSC, and take note Hollywood).

And it feels so Shakespearean to use stories about Italy to talk about England :) (Now I'm curious to see a table of how many Shakespeare plays are set in Italy [or elsewhere] vs. set in England -- esp if we exclude the histories. A quick Google suggests that 1/3 of all Shakespeare's plays are set in Italy. Folgerpedia has a nice sortable table -- which also allows a quick at-a-glance that almost the only plays he sets in England are the histories; the only exception/s being The Merry Wives of Windsor in Shakespeare's modern-day, and King Lear and Cymbeline in mythic pre-Christian Britain.)

Oh, and the latter 2 plays in their ROME season are so great -- Titus being always a trip, and Coriolanus being a lesser-known play I've seen some really great productions of.
hermionesviolin: silhouette of a figure holding an umbrella while rain falls (rain)
Is the weather making the Internet punk out?  'Cause I'm a little sad that I'm so close to being done with putting all my recs into del.icio.us (785 thus far -- you thought I was kidding about 900?) and can't finish.  [Though the smell of rain on pavement makes me so happy.]  Of course, it's only title line and preliminary tagging.  Complete tagging will probably take exponentially longer.  I think I've spent ~16 hours on this.  (I literally haven't set foot outside today, though I am showered and dressed and have taken breaks for food and toilet.)  I said last night that it was better than drugs, and I wouldn't actually know since I'm enough of a control freak to have no desire to try mind-altering substances beyond stuff like over-the-counter painkillers (yeah. I know, alcohol, but that makes me tired and dizzy if I have a lot of it, so I really don't even have much of that), but I was struck by how much I just got into the groove of it and would just work on for long periods of time straight-through -- as opposed to how I've been unable to focus on any task recently, including plenty of stuff I legitimately wanna be working on (e.g. church writeups).

I guess it's probably just as well since I do actually have to get up tomorrow morning to go to work.  It has been suggested that I should just take the whole week off since the network is unlikely to actually be back as scheduled (though I just checked, and Intranet at least is back) but I do have work I can get done without the network, so since the network is scheduled to be back I would feel guilty (I do not have guilt about my two days off earlier this week, though).

MaryAlice is taking the week off, so I'll be spared excessive rantings about the Libby thing.  Trelawney's traveling, but if Sue's at small group tomorrow night I'm sure I'll hear about it.  I really should read up on it [as usual, my instinct is to be contrary and start with reading places like InstaPundit rather than the flist], though that won't happen if I don't have 'Net tomorrow.

In unrelated news, while intellectually I'm aware that anything I post here unlocked could feasibly be read by anyone with an Internet connection, I'm still jarred when worlds collide sometimes.  Someone I spoke with briefly on a Red Line e-mailed me Thomas Friedman's "The Whole World Is Watching" NYT Op-Ed (June 27, 2007).  I should of course be concerned in terms of my job, but it mostly gets me thinking about how someone would perceive me based solely on this space in contrast to how I perceive myself.  I find myself laughing a little when people call this a "blog," because to me that implies so much more actual thematic content of relevance, whereas my LJ is some amalgam of personal anecdotes, fannish reactions, and less thoughtful commentary than I would like.

(P.S. Ms. Lewis, thank you so much for your kind e-mail.  It really brightened my day, and I'll write back at more length when I have a chance.)

Profile

hermionesviolin: an image of Alyson Hannigan (who plays Willow Rosenberg) with animated text "you think you know / what you are / what's to come / you haven't even / BEGUN" (Default)
Elizabeth (the delinquent, ecumenical)

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22 232425262728
29 30     

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 07:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios