[Friday] in which i offend everyone
May. 10th, 2008 11:58 pmYesterday felt like Friday, so today felt kind of like a fake day -- especially since it was so quiet at my end of the hall. When I was wrapping up at the end of the day I literally almost forgot to turn off my computer, forgetting that no I was not coming back into the office the next day.
Teaching's over in exactly one week. I look forward to the faculty reemerging from having been swallowed whole by the course.
***
( gym )
***
On one of the tv screens at the gym this morning I saw "and baby makes 20: the return of the Duggans" (TODAY). I cringed, of course, but I also thought about how sk8eeyore's been posting excerpts from Amy Laura Hall and such about being open to God's gift of life and not trying to control it. ( Read more... )
I love this bit from the end of that last-linked interview with Amy Laura Hall (in which she's talking about the banquet passage in Luke -- my response was of course, "which banquet passage in Luke?" but I assume she means Luke 14: 7-24):
I was browsing Christianity Today [which I hadn't realized until today is "a magazine of evangelical conviction"] online ('cause I remembered that someone on Sunday had mentioned that Will got quoted) and I saw a a link to a blogpost about evangelicals and the GLBT Day of Silence. It included:
Teaching's over in exactly one week. I look forward to the faculty reemerging from having been swallowed whole by the course.
***
( gym )
***
On one of the tv screens at the gym this morning I saw "and baby makes 20: the return of the Duggans" (TODAY). I cringed, of course, but I also thought about how sk8eeyore's been posting excerpts from Amy Laura Hall and such about being open to God's gift of life and not trying to control it. ( Read more... )
I love this bit from the end of that last-linked interview with Amy Laura Hall (in which she's talking about the banquet passage in Luke -- my response was of course, "which banquet passage in Luke?" but I assume she means Luke 14: 7-24):
This is something that my students get more riled up about than any other topic that I bring up. I swear, in some ways, abortion and homosexuality are less contentious among my students than the issue of what kind of wedding to have, what kind of wedding banquet to plan. The way that young Protestant couples plan their weddings bodes very ill for the kind of family they are hoping to become. You watch what a wedding is often about these days -- it is about displaying one's wealth to those one is eager to impress. If you think instead about the scriptural wedding itself, about being the open banquet that one hopes one's marriage will be, I think weddings would look a lot different than they do. I think they would be on a Sunday morning service where everyone is invited. I think they would look more like a potluck than the kind of catered extravagances toward which even the middle class is climbing. I think the image of the banquet where the blind and the lame are invited, and those who cannot repay us, that image would be one in which to start a marriage.***
I was browsing Christianity Today [which I hadn't realized until today is "a magazine of evangelical conviction"] online ('cause I remembered that someone on Sunday had mentioned that Will got quoted) and I saw a a link to a blogpost about evangelicals and the GLBT Day of Silence. It included:
In addition to boycott, protest, and the creation of an alternative, the Day of Silence saw another response from evangelical Christians--participation. The Golden Rule Pledge is promoted by Grove City College Psychology Professor Warren Throckmorton as an option for "straight Christian and conservative students [who] are conflicted about this day. They do not affirm homosexual behavior but they also loathe disrespect, harrassment or violence toward any one, including their GLBT peers." ( Read more... )