Elizabeth (the delinquent, ecumenical) (
hermionesviolin) wrote2004-07-13 07:07 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
fandoms
Remember how i watched the Buffy musical with Jonah and he fell in love? Well Sunday night he IMs me:
Speaking of overrated. I read the in the most recent NYT Magazine and of course it mentioned "Art Spiegelman's groundbreaking" Maus. I finally read Maus recently and was almost bored. Am i missing something? (Note to self: must write Nancy Pearl and complain that Sandman wasn’t mentioned under Graphic Novels in Book Lust.)
Ellyn e-mailed on Monday saying they had free tickets to I, Robot, so i reread the Asimov book, which i had been meaning to since i saw the ads for the movie.
I realized that Chapter 2: Runaround, is what i think of as I, Robot. The ads remind me of Philip K. Dick's Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, which got turned into Blade Runner. Having reread the Asimov book, the ads most reminded me of “Little Lost Robot.” People on IMDb have suggested that the movie is likely aiming to be another I, Robot chapter -- in the spirit of Asimov’s world but not explicitly adapting any particular story.
Having finished the book i thought "Wow Asimov is brilliant" and decided i really didn’t wanna see the mutant hybrid of a movie. I might not have been allowed to anyway, actually. Jenny said Ellyn wouldn’t let her go. Maybe you had to be a mentor? (Neither of us are.) Bonding time with the girls or whatever. Blah.
TNG:
“Violations” (5.12) ... omg that was possibly the most disturbing episode ever.
“Conundrum” (5.14) ... gah! it’s the “Tabula Rasa” (BtVS 6.08) episode. (
ladyvivien: i’ve decided Ro Laren is Vash done right. Leaving aside the whole relationship part of it, that is. She has Vash’s attitude but i actually like her.)
So Buffy is like the best thing ever. How could you not tell me that it was so wonderful. (I took out the first season on DVD from the library.)I finally saw Y Tu Mamá También. What’s the big deal about that movie? (Sidenote: it reminded me a lot of Nico and Dani.)
It really amazing. It's so well-written and compelling, and the metaphors are creative and fresh and deal with teen issues so well. The dialogue and script is wonderful, and Joss Whedon seems like the coolest person ever.
Speaking of overrated. I read the in the most recent NYT Magazine and of course it mentioned "Art Spiegelman's groundbreaking" Maus. I finally read Maus recently and was almost bored. Am i missing something? (Note to self: must write Nancy Pearl and complain that Sandman wasn’t mentioned under Graphic Novels in Book Lust.)
Ellyn e-mailed on Monday saying they had free tickets to I, Robot, so i reread the Asimov book, which i had been meaning to since i saw the ads for the movie.
I realized that Chapter 2: Runaround, is what i think of as I, Robot. The ads remind me of Philip K. Dick's Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, which got turned into Blade Runner. Having reread the Asimov book, the ads most reminded me of “Little Lost Robot.” People on IMDb have suggested that the movie is likely aiming to be another I, Robot chapter -- in the spirit of Asimov’s world but not explicitly adapting any particular story.
Having finished the book i thought "Wow Asimov is brilliant" and decided i really didn’t wanna see the mutant hybrid of a movie. I might not have been allowed to anyway, actually. Jenny said Ellyn wouldn’t let her go. Maybe you had to be a mentor? (Neither of us are.) Bonding time with the girls or whatever. Blah.
TNG:
“Violations” (5.12) ... omg that was possibly the most disturbing episode ever.
“Conundrum” (5.14) ... gah! it’s the “Tabula Rasa” (BtVS 6.08) episode. (
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Ergo, 'groundbreaking'.
Personally, I found Maus to be fantastic (there are things that one doesn't always pick up on a first read), and I own a copy of the second half.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Sorry, I can't remember what "Violations" is about and I wanna know. ...erm, please
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*closes both to-do list and schedule* I don't even have the time to schedule anything right now.
no subject
no subject
OH! The building with all the books and tapes and videos and stuff? I've been in a few, but I don't know that my local library has that much to choose from. I do, after all, live in a town with a population under 2,500.
no subject
Interlibrary loan is one of the best things ever.
no subject
I think that the last time I spent TONS of time in a library was when I was trying to stay in touch with Mm while I was sans computer. I was also trying to write an adaptation of O. Henry's "The Last Leaf" and "The Gift of the Magi" for a community theatre. I didn't get far, but it's a project I think I'd like to pick up again.
no subject
One thing that did grip me was the interplay of past and present: the son coming to terms with a father who really isn't a perfect man and with his horrific past. For example, when he breaks in with his old Underground comic about his mother's death. That's a case where the medium allowed Spiegelman to do something really visceral that couldn't have been pulled off in a purely written narrative. That was a case where the graphic medium was really propelling the story.
That's why I want to go back to Maus, so I can look for more like that. Otherwise, though, I'd recommend Persepolis as a case where the graphic novel aspect really holds hands with the narrative throughout the author's memoir, charging it with immediacy and starkness. For one thing, it's more introspective and the comic medium loves introspection because of the freedom of the human mind. Maus, while it certainly has it's moments, is largely "Just the facts, Ma'am" (except for when it stops being about the father's story and is the son's instead.)
no subject
When i read Maus i made sure to get both I and II, so i have read the full work.
The interplay of past and present was quite interesting, but generally my feeling was, as you say, that it was just another survivor's story told in a different medium. As i said above, i validate the groundbreaking since it's a form still not taken seriously. I just don't think the work itself is, in and of itself, all that remarkable. I think it's tremendously difficult to write something new about the Holocaust. I mean, the stories are always horrific, but there's a certain sense of "If you've read one, you've read them all."
"Violations"
(Anonymous) 2004-07-15 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)Says Tarmen, the older Ulian, at the beginning of "Violations:" "Sometimes, with a beautiful woman, I cannot help myself." (after his son has reminded him it's not allowed to read someone's mind without her permission--in this case, Beverley Crusher's)
Warf, when asked if he would like to explore a memory, "Klingons do not allow themselves to be probed."
It's almost Oedipal: Jev, the Ulian son, is jealous of his father who can easily probe people's memories. While his father generally does it by consent, his son starts doing it ("doing it") without consent and he schemes to get the father taken out of the picture (perhaps killed; the script only talks of extremely severe punishment).
The episode was a very clever way to provide backstory.
A bothersome science nit: Giordi tells Data that human memory is a continuous string of RNA (like a sort of super-film). But memory is not a recording of what happens in chronological order. It's a highly processed storage of some things that parts of the mind find important. And they are recorded in schematic form, often out of chronological order. What is considered salient is recorded and the rest isn't. Memories are then essentially reconstructed when they are brought into consciousness. The reconstruction is incomplete at best, and often is wrong. (this paragraph should probably be read in Data's voice.)
RAS